In a time where algorithms write poems, make art, and even drive cars, it does not come as much of a shock that artificial intelligence has also normalised handling money. Nowadays, with robo-advisors and AI-directed budgeting programmes, technology becomes the interface to our wallets. But the big question remains: With these advancements, can you really allow an AI to take charge of your finances better in comparison to you?
So the short answer might be yes, but not without any conditions. In this article, let’s consider how artificial intelligence is changing the financial industry and whether we are ready to surrender the wheel.
AI provides something that even the most hard-working and intelligent investor or budgeter will never be able to deliver. The first one is speed: the capability of processing a large volume of information in real-time without the influence of sentiments or tiredness. Technological software in financial sales can monitor the market trend, analyse the risks that are most likely to happen in the future and consequently change the strategies within seconds.
For instance, there are robo advisors, such as Betterment and Wealthfront, among others; they employ the algorithm to analyse the goal of the person, his/her capacity to bear risk and time horizon. As of that, they build and control the portfolio of the respective investments — with no feelings to influence them and no twists in their decisions. These platforms also constantly rebalance the portfolio and automatically reinvest dividends, something that is cheaper than hiring an actual financial advisor.
AI-based budgeting tools also do not only focus on the recording of expenses. Currently, there are third-party applications such as Cleo, YNAB, or PocketGuard analysing one’s spending, pointing out when the person has overspent, offering savings goals, and telling where the person could potentially trim some of their expenses—activities humans may not be able to see themselves.
This being the case, personal finance is much more than what the AI can do. It is about purpose, principles, feelings, and transitions in one’s life, which are aspects that AI is yet to master. For example, choosing between saving for a child’s education, buying a house, or retiring before a certain age involves sacrifices that cannot be spelt out by a machine.
However, AI may note something as a trend even if it can’t necessarily comprehend the ‘‘why’’ behind financial behaviours. What is the reason that you incurred more expenses than you planned for this month? What made you reluctant to invest in the stock market? The advantage of having a human financial advisor is that he or she is apt to notice such things and adjust behaviour based on emotions in a manner that a machine might not.
Trust is another factor. Some investors have not yet come to terms with endowing the full authority to a machine to speak for their portfolio during economic happenings, especially during a bear market, which requires comforting.
Perhaps the best way is to find harmony between the human and the machine while choosing the best option. Financial firms are introducing hybrid modes where the AI generates recommendations and the portfolio and its implications are explained by human beings, besides providing encouragement.
It is a synergistic approach that ensures that the financial management is informed by rationality and emotions. AI handles the mechanics; humans guide the meaning.
Of course, trusting your entire financial life to an artificial intelligence system makes one paranoid. The model identified some important challenges in the field that will be discussed in this paper, including Privacy is among the largest. Due to the nature of the material that needs to be analysed, AI tools must be given access to financial data. The issue of how this data is protected and does not fall into the wrong hands is something that is becoming a big concern as more and more organisations become susceptible to cybercriminals.
There is also the problem of prejudice. This means that the more advanced any AI system became, the better it was going to be, as it depended on the amount and quality of data that it received. However, if that data is filled with biases inherent to the society, it only worsens the problem, and the system becomes an enforcer of such biases. There will be reduced discrimination in lending, insurance, and investment advice through the use of transparent algorithms and ethical approaches to AI design.
Now, do you think that AI is more capable of handling your finances as compared to you? In many ways, yes, particularly when it comes to calculations, rationality, and procedures. However, AI is not entirely the solution that many people think it is. The future of finance possibly has to do with the idea of partnership. AI is an intelligent and capable assistant, while humans as the wise consciousness decision makers.
Technological advancement remains an opportunity rather than a threat in that it facilitates the humans to make intelligent decisions regarding the financial aspects with the help of tools that can toil ceaselessly.